Judge: Laurel gas plant decision is up to Yellowstone County
In a long-running dispute about a methane-fired electricity plant being built near Laurel, a Yellowstone County district court judge has said the decision on zoning the property belongs to the county alone.
NorthWestern Energy, the state’s largest public utility, has partially constructed an 18-turbine, 175-megawatt plant within a mile of the Laurel City limits. The energy company says additional power generation is needed for the largest county in the state, which is also home to three oil refineries and a host of other industrial businesses.
Although the plant is outside city limits, jurisdiction over zoning authority in this case was in question.
Groups of residents and several other conservation organizations have fought against the plant’s permitting, arguing that officials weren’t following proper zoning laws, and the greenhouse gases emitted by the turbines would violate the state constitution’s guarantee of a “clean and healthful environment.”
The plant and its zoning have been debated for several years in a three-party dispute among the residents who live nearby, the City of Laurel and Yellowstone County. At the heart of the debate was whether Laurel or the county had the final say on zoning in the area.
On Monday, Judge Jessica T. Fehr said that the decision rests completely with Yellowstone County, and that it has repeatedly exercised its jurisdiction in the unincorporated areas and subdivisions nearby.
Laurel and the county had different interpretations of state law that were before Fehr.
Laurel had asserted that it had powers to regulate zoning on lands that were nearby — within a mile-and-a-half of city limits. The county had said that it believed it had the power to regulate the land, which is unincorporated and remains part of the county, not annexed. The issue had been winding its way through a joint city-county planning commission while the court process had played out. That commission was still in the process of making recommendations and hearing residents. The city-county planning commission is advisory, though.
Fehr said that Montana makes clear that once a county exercises zoning control or makes subdivision plans that zoning then becomes the prerogative of the county alone, and that Laurel has no say in the matter, except to make recommendations or have hearings via the joint city-county planning commission, which is non-binding.
“The City of Laurel has no jurisdictional authority over the property at issue in this matter,” Fehr said. “Any disputes regarding land uses for the property at issue in this matter are properly resolved within Yellowstone County and its jurisdictional authority, unless and until such time as Yellowstone County formally ceded is jurisdictional authority to the City of Laurel, through properly-noticed means and appropriate legal mechanisms.”
In her ruling, Fehr said that cities can exercise “extraterritorial jurisdiction” on land that’s either adjacent or nearby a city, according to state law. However, that power ends once a county has adopted zoning or subdivision regulations, which Yellowstone County has done.
“The county has retained its jurisdictional control over subdivision approvals and regulations,” Fehr said.
In a 23-page decision, Fehr also cited numerous examples of where Yellowstone County had exercised its control on zoning and subdivisions, even on some land owned by residents living on or near Thiel Road where the plant is being built.
Instead, Fehr clarified that the county still maintains control of zoning and subdivision issues, but authorizes the city-county planning board to make “planning recommendations” and hear issues related to zoning.
When contacted by the Daily Montanan on Monday, organizations representing the plaintiffs and property owners said that they were still analyzing what the ruling will mean going forward. Nearly three weeks ago, the city-county planning board ordered a work session to examine more of the issues with residents. Now, with Fehr’s ruling, it’s unclear if those work sessions will continue, or if the matter will be appealed.
Anne Hedges, with the Montana Environmental Information issued the following statement after Fehr’s ruling:
A spokesperson with the Northern Plains Resource Council said the group was disappointed by Fehr’s decision.