Home Part of States Newsroom
Brief
US Rep. Deborah Ross sponsors bill to protect reproductive health privacy

Share

US Rep. Deborah Ross sponsors bill to protect reproductive health privacy

Mar 29, 2024 | 3:54 pm ET
By Rob Schofield
Share
US Rep. Deborah Ross sponsors bill to protect reproductive health privacy
Description
Left to right: North Carolina Democratic Congresswomen Valerie Foushee, Kathy Manning, Deborah Ross and Alma Adams - Photo: House.gov

Threats to the privacy (and even the freedom and safety) of women seeking abortions and other forms of reproductive healthcare has been much in the news since the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade.

With several states moving to quickly criminalize abortion and some even pursuing efforts to ban travel to states where the care remains lawful, concerns have arisen that law enforcement officers seeking to enforce abortion bans might use digital technology to track women and those who would aid them in interstate travel.

A new proposal in the U.S. House sponsored by Wake County Democrat Deborah Ross seeks to address the issue head-on.

According to a release from the lawmaker’s office, she and four other Democratic co-sponsors — Reps. Ted W. Lieu (CA-36), Sara Jacobs (CA-51), Hillary Scholten (MI-03), and Maxwell Frost (FL-10) — have proposed a bill entitled the Reproductive Data Privacy and Protection Act. The release explains the proposal this way:

“Since the 2022 Dobbs Supreme Court decision, law enforcement agencies have obtained data, including geolocation data and private messages, to investigate and prosecute abortions. This data could also be used to investigate other areas of reproductive and sexual health such as IVF treatment and birth control. The Reproductive Data Privacy and Protection Act would protect Americans’ reproductive data privacy by ensuring that any data obtained by law enforcement does not involve or pertain to the criminalization of reproductive and sexual health services. The bill protects individuals’ information related to abortion and IVF care, the use or purchase of contraceptives, period tracker apps, pregnancy-related conditions, and more.”

 

While evidence of the use of such tactics by law enforcement appears limited thus far, the grounds for concern appear genuine.

In February U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) uncovered and disclosed evidence that an anti-abortion advocacy group had obtained cellphone data from a data broker of people who had visited Planned Parenthood facilities across the U.S. and then targeted those individuals with repeated anti-abortion phone messages.

Meanwhile, Newsweek reported earlier this week that “Some California police departments are continuing to share automated license plate reader data with other states which could use the information to track people seeking or providing abortions, according to civil liberties groups.”

Pro-choice advocates have also expressed concern that digital tracking could be extended to monitor and prosecute individuals over their use of in vitro fertilization and even birth control at some point in the future. Last August, CNN reported that Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall stated in court documents that his office was entitled to “prosecute people who make travel arrangements for pregnant women to have out-of-state abortions.”

In her statement, Rep. Ross observed that North Carolina’s recently enacted 12-week abortion ban has created a situation in which “some women are terrified to seek the reproductive health care services they need, and doctors are facing insurmountable obstacles to providing care. We must protect women and doctors from insidious actors who want to restrict and control abortion access even further through data collection and surveillance.”

Click here to read the legislation.