Titus rips bill that ‘doesn’t do anything about affordable housing’

U.S. Rep. Dina Titus told state lawmakers Wednesday that efforts to open up more federal lands for development “doesn’t do anything about affordable housing,” and warned of the consequences Nevadans will face as a result of economic and budget policies being pursued by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans. 

U.S. Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto and U.S. Rep. Susie Lee, both Democrats, reintroduced the Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act, commonly referred to as the Clark County Lands Bill, in March. 

The measure would open 25,000 acres of public land in Southern Nevada that Cortez Masto and Lee say could lead to development of more affordable housing.

Opponents warn the bill is a recipe for unsustainable urban sprawl that will not significantly address the housing shortage. 

In a statement emailed to Nevada Current, Titus said she is opposed to the lands bill as it is currently written, saying it will make “land available to developers to build more homes that average Nevadans cannot afford.”

“There is no requirement for set-asides for affordable housing in new developments” in the legislation, Titus said in the email. “Affordable housing should be the goal of a lands bill, not incidental to it.”

Titus sponsored a version of the bill with Cortez Masto in 2021. In a statement, her office said “it has become clearer since 2021 that developers want to build more expensive homes in the ‘ex-urbs,’” and “the cost of providing infrastructure has become prohibitively expensive” especially considering the impact of Trump’s tariffs on building materials.

State lawmakers recently passed a resolution backing the passage of the federal bill, which Titus took aim at while addressing them in Carson City. 

“You’re supporting a lands bill and think that’s a silver bullet for affordable housing,” Titus said to legislators. “That bill doesn’t do anything about affordable housing and certainly doesn’t require anybody to pay for the infrastructure that’s going to be needed for that growth.”

When asked about Titus’ comments to state lawmakers, Lauren Wodarski, a spokesperson for Cortez Masto, said the senator has repeatedly called for an “all of the above approach” to address the housing crisis. 

She also noted the legislation is supported by “affordable housing organizations and local governments who all agree it is necessary to make more land available for housing development in Southern Nevada.”

In her email to the Current, Titus also underscored the point she made to state lawmakers that the lands bill does not take into account “the cost of providing infrastructure to outlying developments, which taxpayers rather than developers would be required to pay for.” She also said the legislation would “create new burdens on our limited water supply.”

Another “major flaw” of the federal lands bill is that “it encourages expensive urban sprawl when there are lands within our existing urban area that could be developed without distant and costly extensions of infrastructure,” Titus noted.

A local analysis by the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern and the regional planning collaborative known as Southern Nevada Strong has shown significant infill land available.

The study, released in February, found 78,285 acres that “were identified as vacant or underutilized land” and “approximately 85% (69,300 acres) was classified as vacant, while the remaining 15% was deemed underutilized.”

Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo has long pushed for more federal land to be opened up as a solution to develop housing. 

Lombardo sent several letters to the Biden administration last year that blamed the administration for its role in the housing crisis, saying it wasn’t doing enough to make more federal land available for housing development.

Assembly Joint Resolution 10, which also calls on the federal government to release federal lands, passed April 17, 36-6, with overwhelming support from Democrats and unanimous support from Republicans. 

Six Democratic Assemblymembers, Natha Anderson, Venicia Considine, Tanya Flanagan, Selena La Rue Hatch, Cinthia Moore, and Howard Watts, voted against the resolution.

The measure has not been voted on in the Senate. 

‘You’ll be back’

Titus, who herself served in the Nevada Legislature for two decades prior to winning election to federal office, spent most of her address to state lawmakers warning of a “tsunami” of challenges coming to Nevada as a result of actions already taken by Trump as well as policies Trump is pushing the Republican held Congress to enact.

Trump’s sweeping global tariffs will increase the price not only of consumer goods, but also the cost of housing, Titus said. 

“If you’re going to put tariffs on construction materials like steel, lumber and aluminum and you’re going to try to build affordable housing, those prices are going to go up,” she said. 

Trump’s many tariffs currently in effect include a global 25% levy on aluminum, lumber, and steel.

“Again, that’s going to hurt Nevadans and make it harder at a time we need more housing for people to get into a house,” Titus said.

Republicans in Congress have also proposed sweeping cuts to various federal programs including Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP.

Trump has issued multiple executive orders curtailing, halting or ending altogether federal funding for a host of federal programs.

Elon Musk, the billionaire head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, has also cut swaths of federal funding, positions and projects. 

Noting about 30% of Nevada total state government funding comes from the federal government, Titus warned  state lawmakers they will be forced to deal with the consequences of federal cuts. 

“As y’all have to deal with every day, Nevada requires a balanced budget,” Titus said. “You’re going to have to deal with what’s coming on May 1,” she said, referring to the date when the state Economic Forum will set its final budget limits that legislators and the governor must meet when they approve a budget for the upcoming biennium.

“When you get the economic forecast May 1, you’ll be hearing how much funds will be cut and how much you can spend. I’m not too optimistic,” Titus said, adding “it’s likely you’ll be back in a special session when you figure out just how much it is you’re going to have to cut or pay for or eliminate.”

“You have to deal with this firestorm somehow,” she said.