Statehouse scraps: Catholic lobby’s stance on abuse bill, Medicaid losses, fentanyl frustration
News officially overflowed this week.
Not only did Kansas Reflector reporters chase a multitude of stories around the Statehouse, but events we already covered unwound in unpredictable ways. You’ll see how throughout today’s roundup.
In the middle of this all, we managed to speak to audiences in Hutchinson and Valley Falls. Thanks to the 200 or so folks who turned out at both events. We appreciate your insightful questions, and we plan to keep mopping up the news and bringing it to you.
Now, let’s all take a deep, refreshing breath before plunging into the icy water.
OK. Time to begin.
Catholic Conference stance
If Kansas legislators want to know whether the Catholic Church’s lobbying arm supports efforts to reform child sex abuse law, they had better ask.
Both Kansas Reflector editor Sherman Smith and I wrote about the valiant quest of sex abuse survivors to reform statute of limitations laws. A pressing question has been how the church’s lobbying arm, the Kansas Catholic Conference, would respond.
Smith excerpted some of the statement issued by conference executive director Chuck Weber, but nowhere in the text does the conference explicitly endorse the bill or promise to lobby for the legislation. So I emailed Weber, a former legislator, to ask whether either action was planned.
After reiterating the statement, he added that: “If asked by elected officials in the House or Senate, we would recommend passage of SB 317.”
There you have it, folks. If you want to know, you have to ask.
‘Death and destruction’
You might recall that earlier this work I cautioned politicians to be careful about the words they use. Heedless rhetoric can torpedo trust in government and destabilize institutions.
Former President Trump was one of my examples, but he apparently didn’t see the column. He wrote Friday on his Truth Social platform: “What kind of person can charge another person, in this case a former President of the United States, who got more votes than any sitting President in history, and leading candidate (by far!) for the Republican Party nomination, with a Crime, when it is known by all that NO Crime has been committed, & also known that potential death & destruction in such a false charge could be catastrophic for our Country?”
So much for keeping a cool head.
Health insurance loss
The Kansas Health Institute, an erstwhile nonprofit across the street from the Statehouse, published an article Wednesday outlining big changes coming to the state’s Medicaid program. Thanks to pandemic-era federal rules, tens of thousands of Kansans have remained on the public health insurance rolls without eligibility checks. All of that is about to change, with the COVID-19 public health emergency drawing to a close March 31.
According to the institute’s calculations, 132,701 Kansans stand to lose their coverage in coming months. That’s the difference between folks who were enrolled before the pandemic and those enrolled at the end of last year.
“As eligibility redeterminations resume, many of these Kansans may not be aware of the requirements or may be unable to complete the requirements to maintain coverage, or they may no longer be eligible for Medicaid coverage, and are at risk of becoming uninsured,” writes KHI’s Phillip Steiner.
Speaking of which, expanding the KanCare program would cover an estimated 150,000 Kansans. GOP legislative leaders have steadfastly refused to do so, but it’s worth pointing out that our state has covered nearly as many extra people over the last few years and no one appeared to notice. Except the people who actually had health insurance, of course.
Rep. Jason Probst, D-Hutchison, has been a determined advocate for legalizing fentanyl test strips in Kansas. The strips allow users to detect the presence of the substance in other drugs. Unfortunately during this last week, a bill clearing their use was unceremoniously gutted in the Senate. The House had approved the measure unanimously, but never mind.
Probst wrote a remarkable, anguished piece on his Substack page about the move. A couple of selected paragraphs follow:
“In this building, we’re supposed to be here to do good work. To help people. To learn — about our state, our industries, our people, and the challenges they encounter in their daily lives. And we’re supposed to use that information to put in place policy that will make our state better.
“Many days, I don’t feel that’s what’s happening here. And certainly when it comes to battling our opioid epidemic, and the growing scourge of fentanyl, there’s a group of people – all of them in the Senate – who refuse to acknowledge this reality or to take even the simplest steps to help.”
The Rev. Susan Candea, bishop for the Central States Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, issued a powerful statement March 17 about legislation in Kansas and Missouri targeting transgender people. Thanks to Rabbi Moti Rieber for the tip. An excerpt follows:
“Be careful when you draw a line between ‘us’ and ‘them,’ because Jesus is always on the other side with ‘them.'”
I do not remember when or from whom I heard that statement. However, it has stuck with me and challenges me as I continue to wrestle with proclaiming the gospel in relevant and faithful ways. The gospels are filled with stories of Jesus standing with, eating with, healing, touching, and welcoming those whom the culture labeled as “them” – Samaritans, lepers, tax collectors, women, outcasts, children, the least, the last, the poor, the meek, those who mourn, and those who are persecuted — proclaiming that in God’s reign “they” are the greatest. Our society often labels transgender people and those who identify as LGBTQIA+ as “them.” Today I am writing to publicly announce that I stand with “them.”
You can read the entire statement here, as posted on the synod’s Facebook page.
Trans bill veto
While we’re on the subject, Gov. Laura Kelly vetoed a bill March 17 that bars transgender girls and women from playing on girls’ and women’s teams in K-12 schools and college.
As I’ve written in this space before, attention now turns to the sole Democrat who voted for the bill in the House, Rep. Ford Carr of Wichita. If he were to flip his vote on an override attempt, Carr could prevent the bill from becoming law. (So could any number of Republicans in either chamber, but the bill appears to be a priority for their leaders.)
Unfortunately for advocates, it doesn’t look like that’s going to happen. Carr told the Kansas City Star that he didn’t plan on changing his stance and that “I haven’t considered it any further.”
That’s likely to be cold comfort for LGBTQ Kansans looking to live free from state-sanctioned discrimination.
Open records update
If you were listening to KCUR on Monday morning, you heard your favorite opinion editor (or second-favorite, for you Dion Lefler fans) on Up to Date. I talked about Emporia State University’s attempt to prevent or delay the Reflector’s recent open-records request.
During the show, I said we had decided to pay the ridiculous $700 ransom demanded by university officials. Here’s an update on where things stand. After making the payment on Monday morning, ESU processed it at 1:30 p.m. Wednesday. We now wait to see if it takes them a full 20 hours — at $35 an hour! — to tell us which professors received performance bonuses this semester. Yes, we were really asking the tough questions there.
Clay Wirestone is Kansas Reflector opinion editor. Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.