Forget the dadgum cookies. In race between Roger Marshall and Adam Hamilton, follow the money.
Everyone was chattering about cookies late last week.
Specifically, political pundits and their online fans were discussing U.S. Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kansas, apparently stiffing a local bakery back in 2020. A bill of $678.75 went unpaid. Marshall finally reimbursed the small business owner, no doubt hoping to make the viral story go away.
But another report emerged on Friday, a thoroughly researched and damning account by Kansas Reporter editor-in-chief Sherman Smith and MS NOW’s Matt Fuller. It might have been overshadowed by the cookie caterwauling, but it shouldn’t have been.
Sometimes bills go unpaid. But Smith and Fuller’s story suggests that Marshall’s Washington, D.C., office skirted ethical lines, blurring boundaries between taxpayer-funded official business and campaigning.
Experts contacted for comment raised alarms. Marshall’s lawyers refused to address the substance of the reporting.
If you’re looking for red flags, friends, they’re here. And not just one or two.
Here are just five alarming paragraphs selected from Smith and Fuller’s damning story. The questions raised and comments made suggest to me — at best — an operation willing to take numerous and repeated ethical shortcuts. At worst? Well, I’m not a campaign finance expert. But you can see how they reacted below.
- “In a joint investigation, Kansas Reflector and MS NOW obtained audio recordings, photos, videos, screenshots of text messages and calendar items from 2020 — when Marshall first ran for his Senate seat — that appear to show the senator and his top aide repeatedly using congressional staff and government resources in ways that experts say likely crossed the line between official business and campaigning.”
- “Craig Holman, a campaign finance and government ethics expert at Public Citizen — a nonprofit consumer rights and good government group founded by Ralph Nader — said these accounts of Marshall and his office’s ‘blatant disregard’ for congressional ethics rules are ‘both breathtaking and seemingly very damning of Marshall’s character.’ ”
- “Both congressional and campaign staff — many using taxpayer-funded equipment like cellphones and computers — were summoned to the ‘MANDATORY ALL-STAFF CALL,’ as it appeared in their official email calendars. And video of the Oct. 14, 2020, Zoom call shows Marshall and his congressional aides discussing the status of his campaign.”
I need to break in here to note that this all-staff call raised sufficient alarm among staff that they set down their concerns for posterity. Marshall’s then-legislative director, Michael Brooks, texted a staffer: “Sending this message as a reference that we objected to this illegal (activity) and that I raised it with our superiors and noted that it is not permissible per the above ethics statute.”
- Marshall flack Payton “Fuller is both a current congressional staffer — earning a taxpayer-funded salary — and an unpaid campaign volunteer spokeswoman. For that separate story involving Marshall’s Florida property, MS NOW reached out to a generic press email for the campaign. Fuller wrote back, from her campaign email, as ‘communications director for Senator Roger Marshall.’ ”
- “After promising to ‘meaningfully’ respond to a detailed list of questions if Kansas Reflector and MS NOW extended its deadline for comment, Ryan Dollar, a lawyer for the Marshall campaign, sent a statement that did not address the questions.”
Ahem. On Monday, I wrote about the panoply of peculiar stories that attach themselves like so many barnacles to Marshall. This story doesn’t quite fit. It speaks to norms. It speaks to ethics. It speaks to whether the senator and his staff follow the basic rules applied across government offices.
It speaks to character.
But more complicated stories and more challenging subjects matter too. In fact, they usually matter more.
Clay Wirestone is Kansas Reflector opinion editor. His first book, “Opinionated: Kansas Journalists Who Proved Why Commentary Matters — Then and Now,” was published in September 2026 by the University Press of Kansas. Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.